Agentastic vs Paseo
Agentastic and Paseo both orchestrate official coding-agent CLIs, isolate parallel work with git worktrees, provide diff and browser workflows, and expose a CLI for automation. The key choice is the product shape. Agentastic is a fully native macOS development environment: real GPU-accelerated Ghostty terminals, a code editor, an agent-drivable browser, containers, code review, and cloud or remote-SSH workspaces in one app. Paseo is an open-source client-and-daemon system: run the daemon on macOS, Linux, Windows, a VM, or Docker, then connect from desktop, web, iOS, Android, or the Paseo CLI.
The short version
Both are credible multi-agent tools, but they optimize for different places to work.
- Choose Agentastic for the deepest native Mac workspace: terminal, editor, browser automation, diff, code review, containers, issue tracking, and remote runtimes together.
- Choose Paseo when cross-platform hosting, a self-hosted daemon, native mobile access, or AGPL-licensed source is the deciding requirement.
- Keep using the same Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Copilot, OpenCode, or other provider accounts either way — neither product replaces the underlying agent subscription.
Who should choose each option
Agentastic
Choose Agentastic if you work on macOS and want a terminal-first, fully native IDE with a built-in editor, scriptable browser, containers, code review, and free cloud or SSH agent workspaces.
Paseo
Choose Paseo if you need Linux or Windows hosts, phone access, a browser client, a self-hosted daemon, or an AGPL-3.0 codebase you can audit and fork.
Feature comparison
| Agentastic | Paseo | |
|---|---|---|
| Product shape | Fully native macOS development environment | Self-hosted daemon with desktop, web, mobile, and CLI clients |
| Platforms | macOS 14+ (Apple Silicon and Intel) | macOS, Linux, Windows, web, iOS, Android |
| Primary agent surface | The agent's real CLI in a GPU-accelerated Ghostty terminal; chat available in Agent Home | Provider-native agent UI, terminal panes, and remote clients |
| Supported agents | 40 built-in definitions + custom terminal agents | 39 agents listed, plus ACP catalog and custom CLI providers |
| Git worktrees | Yes | Yes |
| Container isolation | Docker and Apple Container | Docker deployment for the daemon; worktrees for agent tasks |
| Built-in editor | Yes — syntax, LSP, search, and source control | No full code editor; file and diff workflows |
| Built-in browser | Yes — preview, dev browser CLI, console, screenshots, React Grab, share tunnel | Yes — preview browser and per-worktree service URLs |
| Code review | Diff viewer + Claude, Codex, CodeRabbit, Greptile | Inline diff review |
| Automation CLI | System-wide dev CLI controls a running app over JSON-RPC | paseo CLI controls local or remote daemons |
| Remote agents | Any SSH server plus Modal, Fly.io, and Vercel Sandbox | Run the self-hosted daemon on a laptop, VM, server, or Docker host |
| Mobile | No native mobile client | Native iOS and Android clients |
| Voice | macOS dictation where supported by the selected input surface | Local speech-to-text and text-to-speech |
| Issue tracking | Linear and Sentry issues can launch agent work | Not a primary product surface |
| License | Free app; open-source transition in progress | Open source, AGPL-3.0 |
Pricing
Agentastic
Free. Bring the subscriptions or API credentials for the agents you run; cloud providers are connected through your own accounts.
Paseo
Free and open source. Bring the subscriptions or credentials for the provider CLIs you run; the project accepts sponsorship.
Using them together
They overlap at the orchestration layer, so most developers will choose one as their primary workspace. Because both invoke official provider CLIs against ordinary repositories and branches, trying both does not lock your code or agent configuration into a proprietary format.
Frequently asked questions
Is Agentastic a Paseo fork?
No. They are independent products with different architectures. Agentastic is a native Swift macOS IDE; Paseo is an AGPL-licensed daemon with clients for desktop, web, mobile, and the CLI.
Which is better for working from a phone?
Paseo. It has native iOS and Android clients. Agentastic focuses on the desktop Mac experience and remote runtimes rather than a phone client.
Which is better for a native Mac terminal workflow?
Agentastic. Agents run in real GPU-accelerated Ghostty terminals inside a native Swift app, with a built-in editor, browser automation, diff, and code-review tools alongside them.
Do both have a CLI?
Yes. Paseo's CLI talks to local or remote Paseo daemons. Agentastic's system-wide dev CLI discovers running app instances and can launch agents, list worktrees, tail output, send follow-ups, focus workspaces, and control browser or scheduled-task workflows.
Can I use custom agents?
Yes. Paseo supports ACP and custom CLI providers. Agentastic provides 40 built-in definitions and lets you add any terminal command under Settings → Connections.
See also
Agentastic vs Conductor
Compare Agentastic and Conductor. Both run coding agents in parallel git worktrees on macOS. Agentastic is a n…
Agentastic vs Superset
Compare Agentastic and Superset. Both run CLI coding agents in parallel git worktrees on macOS. Agentastic is …
Agentastic vs cmux
Compare Agentastic and cmux. cmux is an open-source tmux-style multiplexer for AI coding agents. Agentastic is…